Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > The Doctor is In! > Ask the Doctor
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2024, 06:30 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,986
Default Saturn V #2001 with 24mm cluster.

Gentlemen.

Now that I?m off the Oxy, can sit up straight, and can drink Scotch again I?m going to attempt a project that I?ve never considered before: building a vintage Estes #2001 Saturn V with a 24mm (x3) cluster.

I?ve clustered the #2001 before, but with 18mm (x4). I plant to use a BT-80 stuffer tube as an armature up the middle of the SV and use a Starlight 24mm (x3) kit in the bottom of the stuffer tube.

What I don?t know is: should I extend all 3 engine mount tubes into the parachute compartment, or should I extend only one of the engine tubes into the parachute compartment. OR, should I join all 3 engine tubes into a manifold and have only one engine tube enter the parachute compartment?
Thanks!
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2024, 10:28 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,200
Default

I think I would be tempted to take all three into the parachute compartment. Otherwise, you gotta find a way to do something with the pressure of the other two ejection charges. And funneling all three down to one might be just a bit too much pressure for one single tube.

Just my thoughts.

Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2024, 10:57 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,740
Default

Not to mention that if you choose just one you gotta make doggone sure that one lights every time!

(I had something stronger than "doggone" there but the forum censored me )
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2024, 07:57 AM
HenryMac's Avatar
HenryMac HenryMac is offline
When In Doubt, Build Hell-For-Stout
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Central Colorado
Posts: 405
Default The Mighty Saturn V

Very cool.
I'd run stuffer tubes, and use different motor delays.

I built a Saturn V with the correct number of motors for each stage.
1st Stage: (5) 24 mm
2nd Stage: (5) 18mm
3rd Stage: (1) 18mm
4th Stage: (1) 13mm
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  001.JPG
Views: 19
Size:  178.3 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  002.JPG
Views: 15
Size:  178.5 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  003.JPG
Views: 20
Size:  201.1 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  2023-03-18 Saturn V Simulation As Built.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  182.4 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  2023-04-03 Flight Plot Saturn V All Motors Ignite.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  220.9 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Multiple Stages.jpg
Views: 17
Size:  121.4 KB  
__________________
John Simmons a.k.a. "Lakeroadster"
NAR 113985
My Fleet with Build Data: Lakeroadster's Rocket Shop
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2024, 09:39 AM
astronwolf's Avatar
astronwolf astronwolf is offline
Lost his Drifter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,379
Default

I favor one tube because then you can extend the ejection gas tube waayyy up into the parachute compartment, and pack the chutes along side the ejection gas tube.

A 3-in-1 manifold would eliminate relying on just one motor for recovery. This tube doesn't have to be a BT-50. Could go 3-in-1, BT-50 to BT-60. I'd add some coupler tubing as a liner with 8 inches or so above the motors. It gets a little hot down there.

You might need a little more nose weight.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643 - TRA 15520
MTMA Section #606 President
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2024, 12:35 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,860
Default

Let all three blast the ejection charge into the chute tube.
Use plenty of wadding.
You'll be guaranteed never to have a fail to eject.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, AGITATION, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, AGGRAVATION, INSTIGATION, NUISANCE-ACTION, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024